https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414158 The petitioner challenged an order by the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding a charge memo under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services Rules related to a deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-2010. The Tribunal's order was set aside due to lack of discussion on crucial aspects, directing a rehearing with a speaking order. The charge memo served after a decade raised concerns of affecting promotion, prompting expedited proceedings aiming for a conclusion by December 2021. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair disciplinary proceedings and adherence to legal procedures, ensuring the petitioner's rights and procedural fairness. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Oct 2021 08:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414158 The petitioner challenged an order by the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding a charge memo under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services Rules related to a deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-2010. The Tribunal's order was set aside due to lack of discussion on crucial aspects, directing a rehearing with a speaking order. The charge memo served after a decade raised concerns of affecting promotion, prompting expedited proceedings aiming for a conclusion by December 2021. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair disciplinary proceedings and adherence to legal procedures, ensuring the petitioner's rights and procedural fairness. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414158