<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1198 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414146</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed all three appeals by the assessee concerning disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D for A.Y. 2012-13 and A.Y. 2014-15. In A.Y. 2012-13, the ITAT held that the addition made in the assessment was not sustainable as it was a double addition without new incriminating material. For A.Y. 2014-15, relying on precedent, the ITAT deleted the disallowance as no exempt income was derived. The appeals were allowed, and the judgment was pronounced on 22nd October 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1198 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414146</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed all three appeals by the assessee concerning disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D for A.Y. 2012-13 and A.Y. 2014-15. In A.Y. 2012-13, the ITAT held that the addition made in the assessment was not sustainable as it was a double addition without new incriminating material. For A.Y. 2014-15, relying on precedent, the ITAT deleted the disallowance as no exempt income was derived. The appeals were allowed, and the judgment was pronounced on 22nd October 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>