<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1192 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271B by the Assessing Officer for non-compliance with Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that penalty under Section 271A, not Section 271B, is appropriate when books of accounts are not maintained, relying on the precedent established in CIT v. Bisuali Tractors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 05:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1192 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271B by the Assessing Officer for non-compliance with Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that penalty under Section 271A, not Section 271B, is appropriate when books of accounts are not maintained, relying on the precedent established in CIT v. Bisuali Tractors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>