<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1168 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414116</link>
    <description>A pending refund claim with interest was not decided on merits; the Court directed the competent authority to examine and decide the claim for the relevant period in accordance with law. The authority was also asked to bear in mind the principle of unjust enrichment. The substantive entitlement to refund or interest was left open, and the petition was disposed of by requiring expeditious administrative determination of the pending claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:48:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1168 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414116</link>
      <description>A pending refund claim with interest was not decided on merits; the Court directed the competent authority to examine and decide the claim for the relevant period in accordance with law. The authority was also asked to bear in mind the principle of unjust enrichment. The substantive entitlement to refund or interest was left open, and the petition was disposed of by requiring expeditious administrative determination of the pending claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>