https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414114 The court quashed the private complaint and order against the Petitioner, an e-commerce intermediary, under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The dispute was deemed commercial, not criminal, with no dishonest intent found. As an intermediary, the Petitioner lacked control over product delivery and was not directly involved in any fraudulent acts. The court held that the complaint failed to establish a case of cheating under IPC. Procedural lapses were noted, leading to the quashing of the complaint and process against the Petitioner. en-us Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:48:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414114 The court quashed the private complaint and order against the Petitioner, an e-commerce intermediary, under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The dispute was deemed commercial, not criminal, with no dishonest intent found. As an intermediary, the Petitioner lacked control over product delivery and was not directly involved in any fraudulent acts. The court held that the complaint failed to establish a case of cheating under IPC. Procedural lapses were noted, leading to the quashing of the complaint and process against the Petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414114