<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1645 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2008-09 by deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in treating similar issues and upheld the principle that the Revenue should not challenge a legal position accepted in one case in another case without just cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1645 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2008-09 by deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in treating similar issues and upheld the principle that the Revenue should not challenge a legal position accepted in one case in another case without just cause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>