https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298382 The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned orders and remitting the matters back to the Assessing Officer to re-do the assessment following specific guidelines. The Assessing Officer was directed to complete the process within eight weeks, ensuring a personal hearing for the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a centralised mechanism to handle mismatch cases effectively, aiming to prevent unilateral actions by Assessing Officers and protect revenue interests. Coordination among Assessing Officers and a fair opportunity for dealers during assessments were highlighted to streamline the process and safeguard all parties' interests. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298382 The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned orders and remitting the matters back to the Assessing Officer to re-do the assessment following specific guidelines. The Assessing Officer was directed to complete the process within eight weeks, ensuring a personal hearing for the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a centralised mechanism to handle mismatch cases effectively, aiming to prevent unilateral actions by Assessing Officers and protect revenue interests. Coordination among Assessing Officers and a fair opportunity for dealers during assessments were highlighted to streamline the process and safeguard all parties' interests. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298382