<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1940 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298381</link>
    <description>Where a special statute provides an efficacious dispute-resolution forum for co-operative society disputes, claims falling within the broad statutory definition of &quot;dispute&quot; should ordinarily be pursued under that mechanism and not under Article 226. The Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 was read as covering claims for sums payable to or by a society, whether admitted or not, so admitted liability did not by itself take the matter outside Section 69. In the absence of pleaded violations of statute, natural justice, or other exceptional grounds, writ jurisdiction was not to be invoked. The writ appeals were allowed, the challenged judgments were set aside, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1940 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298381</link>
      <description>Where a special statute provides an efficacious dispute-resolution forum for co-operative society disputes, claims falling within the broad statutory definition of &quot;dispute&quot; should ordinarily be pursued under that mechanism and not under Article 226. The Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 was read as covering claims for sums payable to or by a society, whether admitted or not, so admitted liability did not by itself take the matter outside Section 69. In the absence of pleaded violations of statute, natural justice, or other exceptional grounds, writ jurisdiction was not to be invoked. The writ appeals were allowed, the challenged judgments were set aside, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>