<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1940 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298381</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed as the court found that the writ petitions should not have been entertained by the learned single Judge due to the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 69 of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act. The impugned judgments were set aside, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1940 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298381</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed as the court found that the writ petitions should not have been entertained by the learned single Judge due to the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 69 of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act. The impugned judgments were set aside, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>