https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298378 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record, discovery of new and important matter, or other limited grounds, and cannot be used to reargue the merits or seek a fresh appraisal of evidence. In recruitment matters, a candidate who did not satisfy the prescribed cut-off or eligibility condition cannot claim appointment on the basis of alleged parity with others. The principle of negative equality does not create an enforceable right, even if some other candidates were allegedly treated incorrectly. The document therefore states that ineligible candidates cannot rely on discriminatory treatment to obtain appointment. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298378 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record, discovery of new and important matter, or other limited grounds, and cannot be used to reargue the merits or seek a fresh appraisal of evidence. In recruitment matters, a candidate who did not satisfy the prescribed cut-off or eligibility condition cannot claim appointment on the basis of alleged parity with others. The principle of negative equality does not create an enforceable right, even if some other candidates were allegedly treated incorrectly. The document therefore states that ineligible candidates cannot rely on discriminatory treatment to obtain appointment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298378