<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1686 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298376</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ruling that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to deposits made by the assessee during the investigation period, in line with the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court in the case of EBIZ.COM PVT. LTD. v/s COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS &amp;amp; S.T. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the deposits were not recovered from customers and therefore, the assessee was entitled to a refund of the deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1686 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298376</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ruling that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to deposits made by the assessee during the investigation period, in line with the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court in the case of EBIZ.COM PVT. LTD. v/s COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS &amp;amp; S.T. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the deposits were not recovered from customers and therefore, the assessee was entitled to a refund of the deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>