<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 73 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26977</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging notices for reopening of assessments were disposed of with a direction that the Income-tax Officer first determine, as a preliminary issue, whether the statutory conditions for reopening were satisfied. The court did not adjudicate the merits of the reassessment itself and instead required the threshold jurisdictional to be examined before further proceedings could continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 73 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26977</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging notices for reopening of assessments were disposed of with a direction that the Income-tax Officer first determine, as a preliminary issue, whether the statutory conditions for reopening were satisfied. The court did not adjudicate the merits of the reassessment itself and instead required the threshold jurisdictional to be examined before further proceedings could continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>