https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298384 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was sought in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. The Court noted that the petitioner had already challenged the summoning order in revision without success, and that similarly placed co-accused had surrendered after their challenges failed. In view of the serious economic nature of the allegations, the Court found no sufficient basis to extend pre-arrest protection. Anticipatory bail was therefore declined and the application dismissed. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298384 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was sought in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. The Court noted that the petitioner had already challenged the summoning order in revision without success, and that similarly placed co-accused had surrendered after their challenges failed. In view of the serious economic nature of the allegations, the Court found no sufficient basis to extend pre-arrest protection. Anticipatory bail was therefore declined and the application dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298384