<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1281 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298387</link>
    <description>The High Court partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the refusal to rectify the mistake apparent on record and remanding the matter for proper consideration. The Court emphasized the need for a reevaluation of errors in the assessment orders and highlighted the obligation of authorities to rectify mistakes within the specified timeframe under section 69 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1281 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298387</link>
      <description>The High Court partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the refusal to rectify the mistake apparent on record and remanding the matter for proper consideration. The Court emphasized the need for a reevaluation of errors in the assessment orders and highlighted the obligation of authorities to rectify mistakes within the specified timeframe under section 69 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>