<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1685 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298388</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India addressed the implementation of the Target Plus Scheme for exports made in 2005-06. The court clarified that a no dues certificate was not mandatory as per a trade notice issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. However, applicants were directed to file the certificate in the specified format and approach the Ministry for consideration of benefits. The court emphasized the need to comply with procedures to avail scheme benefits, scheduling the next hearing for further review on 04.02.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1685 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298388</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India addressed the implementation of the Target Plus Scheme for exports made in 2005-06. The court clarified that a no dues certificate was not mandatory as per a trade notice issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. However, applicants were directed to file the certificate in the specified format and approach the Ministry for consideration of benefits. The court emphasized the need to comply with procedures to avail scheme benefits, scheduling the next hearing for further review on 04.02.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>