https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414113 Allegations of hawala or underground banking, forgery, cheating and criminal conspiracy were treated as disclosing a prima facie case for refusing pre-arrest bail, with the Court noting that proof of the transactions was for trial. Foreign proceedings in the Netherlands and the plea that the FIR was not maintainable in India did not bar action where Indian offences arising from the same alleged transactions were pleaded. The petitioner's age and the documentary nature of the record were held insufficient to justify extraordinary pre-arrest relief, and custodial interrogation was considered permissible because the transaction pattern required disclosure. en-us Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414113 Allegations of hawala or underground banking, forgery, cheating and criminal conspiracy were treated as disclosing a prima facie case for refusing pre-arrest bail, with the Court noting that proof of the transactions was for trial. Foreign proceedings in the Netherlands and the plea that the FIR was not maintainable in India did not bar action where Indian offences arising from the same alleged transactions were pleaded. The petitioner's age and the documentary nature of the record were held insufficient to justify extraordinary pre-arrest relief, and custodial interrogation was considered permissible because the transaction pattern required disclosure. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414113