<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 571 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298364</link>
    <description>An order directing winding up of a collective investment scheme could not stand where SEBI proceeded on alleged non-compliance without adequate supporting material and without properly considering compliance already undertaken, the object of the regulations, and investor interests. The tribunal noted that the appellant had obtained provisional registration and had taken substantial steps such as credit rating, audit, appraisal and creation of a trust; some conditions were premature, some could still be complied with on further time, and others required reconsideration by the regulator. The winding-up direction was set aside and the matter remanded to SEBI for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 571 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298364</link>
      <description>An order directing winding up of a collective investment scheme could not stand where SEBI proceeded on alleged non-compliance without adequate supporting material and without properly considering compliance already undertaken, the object of the regulations, and investor interests. The tribunal noted that the appellant had obtained provisional registration and had taken substantial steps such as credit rating, audit, appraisal and creation of a trust; some conditions were premature, some could still be complied with on further time, and others required reconsideration by the regulator. The winding-up direction was set aside and the matter remanded to SEBI for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>