https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298362 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing the Special Judge to examine Smt. Ruchi Saxena as a court witness in a bribery case. The Court emphasized the discretionary power under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be exercised judiciously and found the High Court's direction arbitrary and lacking proper reasoning on the necessity of her testimony. The appeal was allowed, and the judgment was deemed to have exercised power under Section 311 arbitrarily, leading to the appeal's disposal. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Aug 2023 14:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298362 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing the Special Judge to examine Smt. Ruchi Saxena as a court witness in a bribery case. The Court emphasized the discretionary power under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be exercised judiciously and found the High Court's direction arbitrary and lacking proper reasoning on the necessity of her testimony. The appeal was allowed, and the judgment was deemed to have exercised power under Section 311 arbitrarily, leading to the appeal's disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298362