<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1164 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414112</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, deleting the addition of Rs. 1 crore as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) and recognizing the transactions as business advances. Regarding the unexplained investment, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the protective addition upon submission of Form No.5 by the assessee, treating the appeal as allowed for statistical purposes. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1164 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414112</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, deleting the addition of Rs. 1 crore as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) and recognizing the transactions as business advances. Regarding the unexplained investment, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the protective addition upon submission of Form No.5 by the assessee, treating the appeal as allowed for statistical purposes. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>