<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1162 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414110</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the impugned orders, the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the CGST Act, and the procedural propriety of the appellate authority&#039;s actions. The court emphasized the significance of complying with statutory timelines and procedural requirements in fiscal matters, affirming the penalties for errors and the limited scope for judicial interference in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1162 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414110</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the impugned orders, the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the CGST Act, and the procedural propriety of the appellate authority&#039;s actions. The court emphasized the significance of complying with statutory timelines and procedural requirements in fiscal matters, affirming the penalties for errors and the limited scope for judicial interference in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>