<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1152 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for A.Y. 2013-14. It held that as there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, the penalty could not be levied, citing established legal principles and court decisions. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty, emphasizing the significance of this absence of variation in determining penalty imposition under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:40:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1152 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for A.Y. 2013-14. It held that as there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, the penalty could not be levied, citing established legal principles and court decisions. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty, emphasizing the significance of this absence of variation in determining penalty imposition under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>