<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1150 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) and holding that the additions made by the AO were not sustainable in the absence of incriminating evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence and adherence to legal precedents in making additions during assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:40:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1150 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) and holding that the additions made by the AO were not sustainable in the absence of incriminating evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence and adherence to legal precedents in making additions during assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>