<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1139 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 2,00,000 upheld by the CIT(A). The decision emphasized the credibility of the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the source of cash deposits, supported by the CBDT Circular and a precedent from the Agra Tribunal, leading to the removal of the disputed amount from the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:40:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1139 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 2,00,000 upheld by the CIT(A). The decision emphasized the credibility of the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the source of cash deposits, supported by the CBDT Circular and a precedent from the Agra Tribunal, leading to the removal of the disputed amount from the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>