<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1138 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of commission paid to a non-resident foreign payee. The Tribunal held that the commission was not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with France, and thus no Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was required. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) was deemed inapplicable, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1138 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of commission paid to a non-resident foreign payee. The Tribunal held that the commission was not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with France, and thus no Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was required. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) was deemed inapplicable, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>