<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1128 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414076</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail may be granted where the applicant has cooperated with the investigation, custodial interrogation is not shown to be necessary, and there is no concrete material indicating flight risk, witness intimidation, or tampering with evidence. In this matter, the applicant had joined the investigation multiple times, witness statements were recorded, and documentary material had been seized and placed before the Special Court. The Court found no material showing interference with witnesses or evasion of process, and treated the apprehension of arrest as real. Protection against arrest was therefore granted, subject to compliance with directions to join the investigation and not interfere with evidence or witnesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1128 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414076</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail may be granted where the applicant has cooperated with the investigation, custodial interrogation is not shown to be necessary, and there is no concrete material indicating flight risk, witness intimidation, or tampering with evidence. In this matter, the applicant had joined the investigation multiple times, witness statements were recorded, and documentary material had been seized and placed before the Special Court. The Court found no material showing interference with witnesses or evasion of process, and treated the apprehension of arrest as real. Protection against arrest was therefore granted, subject to compliance with directions to join the investigation and not interfere with evidence or witnesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>