<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1926 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that commission paid to a non-resident agent for export order procurement did not constitute fee for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and was not subject to TDS under section 195. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no reason to overturn the lower court&#039;s decision based on legal precedents and the nature of the payment for services rendered outside India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:38:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1926 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that commission paid to a non-resident agent for export order procurement did not constitute fee for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and was not subject to TDS under section 195. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no reason to overturn the lower court&#039;s decision based on legal precedents and the nature of the payment for services rendered outside India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>