<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1125 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414073</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete undisclosed income, emphasizing proper recording of transactions. The challenge to the validity of search proceedings under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act was not pursued, resulting in the dismissal of both revenue&#039;s appeals and assessee&#039;s cross objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1125 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414073</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete undisclosed income, emphasizing proper recording of transactions. The challenge to the validity of search proceedings under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act was not pursued, resulting in the dismissal of both revenue&#039;s appeals and assessee&#039;s cross objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>