<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Resignation and Director Appointment Issues Require Evidence, Not Suitable for Current Quash Petition.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60267</link>
    <description>Effective date of Resignation from the post of Managing Director - Compiling Proceedings against the Director / Petitioner for Non-appointment of Woman Director in the company - Even assuming that the petitioner had submitted his resignation to the Registrar of Companies on 05.09.2013, however, the petitioner had filed FORM DIR-11 only belatedly after initiation of the present proceedings and Form DIR-12 has not been filed subsequently by the company. - This Court is of the view that the grounds and the submissions raised by the petitioner are purely a matter of evidence and the same cannot be gone into by this Court in the quash petition - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:14:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:14:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Resignation and Director Appointment Issues Require Evidence, Not Suitable for Current Quash Petition.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60267</link>
      <description>Effective date of Resignation from the post of Managing Director - Compiling Proceedings against the Director / Petitioner for Non-appointment of Woman Director in the company - Even assuming that the petitioner had submitted his resignation to the Registrar of Companies on 05.09.2013, however, the petitioner had filed FORM DIR-11 only belatedly after initiation of the present proceedings and Form DIR-12 has not been filed subsequently by the company. - This Court is of the view that the grounds and the submissions raised by the petitioner are purely a matter of evidence and the same cannot be gone into by this Court in the quash petition - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:14:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>