https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26961 The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision to treat the salary income from the firms as income of the Hindu undivided families. The partners' lack of special qualifications or services rendered supported the classification of salary income as that of the Hindu undivided family. The court emphasized that income earned with family funds' assistance belongs to the Hindu undivided family, especially when remuneration is essentially a return on family fund investment. The partners' consistent roles before and after receiving salaries, without demonstrating special services or qualifications, led to the conclusion that the salary income was detrimental to family funds and, therefore, belonged to the Hindu undivided family. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:00:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26961 The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision to treat the salary income from the firms as income of the Hindu undivided families. The partners' lack of special qualifications or services rendered supported the classification of salary income as that of the Hindu undivided family. The court emphasized that income earned with family funds' assistance belongs to the Hindu undivided family, especially when remuneration is essentially a return on family fund investment. The partners' consistent roles before and after receiving salaries, without demonstrating special services or qualifications, led to the conclusion that the salary income was detrimental to family funds and, therefore, belonged to the Hindu undivided family. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 27 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26961