<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1084 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414032</link>
    <description>The Application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was held to be barred by Limitation as the Tribunal found that the actual date of default was 19.12.2014, and the Application was filed beyond the three-year Limitation period. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Application on the grounds of a &#039;Pre-Existing Dispute&#039; between the parties, as supported by documentary evidence presented by the Respondent regarding the inferior quality of goods supplied. The Appeal was dismissed, and the Application under Section 9 was rejected, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1084 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414032</link>
      <description>The Application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was held to be barred by Limitation as the Tribunal found that the actual date of default was 19.12.2014, and the Application was filed beyond the three-year Limitation period. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Application on the grounds of a &#039;Pre-Existing Dispute&#039; between the parties, as supported by documentary evidence presented by the Respondent regarding the inferior quality of goods supplied. The Appeal was dismissed, and the Application under Section 9 was rejected, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>