<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1420 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleted the ALP adjustment of Rs. 46,127 for deemed interest on delayed sale proceeds, and held that the retrospective application of the Explanation to Section 92B was impermissible for the assessment year. The decision emphasized adherence to judicial precedents and the principle that amendments expanding section scope cannot have retrospective effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1420 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleted the ALP adjustment of Rs. 46,127 for deemed interest on delayed sale proceeds, and held that the retrospective application of the Explanation to Section 92B was impermissible for the assessment year. The decision emphasized adherence to judicial precedents and the principle that amendments expanding section scope cannot have retrospective effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>