https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298332 The Supreme Court clarified the distinction between its powers under Article 136 and Article 142 of the Constitution of India in a case involving the recovery of excess money from pensionary benefits due to wrong pay fixation. The Court reconciled conflicting judgments by emphasizing that previous decisions were made under Article 142 for equitable outcomes, while the current case established a legal precedent under Article 136. It was concluded that there was no conflict between the judgments, and the matters were remitted to the Division Bench for appropriate disposal. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:18:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298332 The Supreme Court clarified the distinction between its powers under Article 136 and Article 142 of the Constitution of India in a case involving the recovery of excess money from pensionary benefits due to wrong pay fixation. The Court reconciled conflicting judgments by emphasizing that previous decisions were made under Article 142 for equitable outcomes, while the current case established a legal precedent under Article 136. It was concluded that there was no conflict between the judgments, and the matters were remitted to the Division Bench for appropriate disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298332