<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1041 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413989</link>
    <description>The departmental appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions and directions, emphasizing the significance of documentary evidence to establish transaction genuineness under Section 68 and the retrospective applicability of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1041 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413989</link>
      <description>The departmental appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions and directions, emphasizing the significance of documentary evidence to establish transaction genuineness under Section 68 and the retrospective applicability of the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>