<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1030 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413978</link>
    <description>The Court held that lubricants, with a specified duty rate, are not excisable goods under the SVLDRS Scheme. Ambiguity in Section 125 should benefit the assessee, aligning with the Scheme&#039;s objective to reduce litigation. The Writ Petition was allowed, overturning the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under the SVLDRS Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1030 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413978</link>
      <description>The Court held that lubricants, with a specified duty rate, are not excisable goods under the SVLDRS Scheme. Ambiguity in Section 125 should benefit the assessee, aligning with the Scheme&#039;s objective to reduce litigation. The Writ Petition was allowed, overturning the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under the SVLDRS Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>