<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1027 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413975</link>
    <description>Amendment of the Central Sales Tax framework and the later industrial incentive notification made exemption on inter-state sales turnover conditional on compliance with the declaration-form requirement under the statutory scheme. The document notes that furnishing Form C or Form D remained necessary for claiming the exemption, and that a State incentive notification could not override that statutory condition. It also states that promissory estoppel could not be invoked to defeat the statute. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s exemption claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s contrary objection based on non-production of declaration forms did not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1027 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413975</link>
      <description>Amendment of the Central Sales Tax framework and the later industrial incentive notification made exemption on inter-state sales turnover conditional on compliance with the declaration-form requirement under the statutory scheme. The document notes that furnishing Form C or Form D remained necessary for claiming the exemption, and that a State incentive notification could not override that statutory condition. It also states that promissory estoppel could not be invoked to defeat the statute. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s exemption claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s contrary objection based on non-production of declaration forms did not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>