<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 1056 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298303</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the AO&#039;s disallowance of Rs. 45,05,867 for extraction/rescreening charges, finding the expenses inflated. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of Rs. 9,76,185 disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), considering it redundant due to prior disallowance. The appeals were dismissed, with the Tribunal partially allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal on the disallowance issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 1056 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298303</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the AO&#039;s disallowance of Rs. 45,05,867 for extraction/rescreening charges, finding the expenses inflated. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of Rs. 9,76,185 disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), considering it redundant due to prior disallowance. The appeals were dismissed, with the Tribunal partially allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal on the disallowance issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>