https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298309 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ["Ld. CIT(A)"] decision in a case involving issues of opportunity to plead, ex-parte orders, adjournment requests, and additions/disallowances under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)'s orders on all grounds, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to discharge the burden of proof. The Tribunal also mentioned the possibility for the assessee to seek restoration of the appeal through ITAT under Rule 24 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:57:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298309 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ["Ld. CIT(A)"] decision in a case involving issues of opportunity to plead, ex-parte orders, adjournment requests, and additions/disallowances under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal affirmed the Ld. CIT(A)'s orders on all grounds, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to discharge the burden of proof. The Tribunal also mentioned the possibility for the assessee to seek restoration of the appeal through ITAT under Rule 24 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298309