<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1211 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298300</link>
    <description>Income attributable to India and tax chargeability for alleged business activity in India were disposed of by applying the Tribunal&#039;s prior common judgment dated 25.02.2009, because the present appeals involved an identical factual matrix and the same legal questions. The Court noted that the Tribunal had followed its earlier reasoning for the same assessee and similar issues, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge on attribution and the assessee&#039;s challenge on non-chargeability were both resolved in terms of that earlier decision. The pendency of special leave petitions against the earlier judgment was recorded but did not affect the disposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:17:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1211 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298300</link>
      <description>Income attributable to India and tax chargeability for alleged business activity in India were disposed of by applying the Tribunal&#039;s prior common judgment dated 25.02.2009, because the present appeals involved an identical factual matrix and the same legal questions. The Court noted that the Tribunal had followed its earlier reasoning for the same assessee and similar issues, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge on attribution and the assessee&#039;s challenge on non-chargeability were both resolved in terms of that earlier decision. The pendency of special leave petitions against the earlier judgment was recorded but did not affect the disposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>