<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1008 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413956</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the cross objection, determining that the non-compete fee received was a capital receipt not subject to tax, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decisions in Guffic Chem and Shiv Raj Gupta. The Tribunal reconsidered its initial dismissal based on legal precedents, including the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in Silverline, allowing the new claim to be raised at any stage. The decision was pronounced on 13/10/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1008 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413956</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the cross objection, determining that the non-compete fee received was a capital receipt not subject to tax, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decisions in Guffic Chem and Shiv Raj Gupta. The Tribunal reconsidered its initial dismissal based on legal precedents, including the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in Silverline, allowing the new claim to be raised at any stage. The decision was pronounced on 13/10/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>