<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1005 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the non-resident AEs were standard automated services without human intervention and did not qualify as Fee for Technical Services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on these payments. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1005 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the non-resident AEs were standard automated services without human intervention and did not qualify as Fee for Technical Services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on these payments. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>