<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1003 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413951</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remitted the issue of deletion of the addition of Rs. 2,24,00,000 on account of unexplained trade receivable back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision based on all evidence. The deletion of the disallowance of depreciation amounting to Rs. 28,76,386 was upheld, but subject to verification by the AO regarding the purchase dates of the assets. The Tribunal provided detailed analysis and directions for each issue raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1003 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413951</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remitted the issue of deletion of the addition of Rs. 2,24,00,000 on account of unexplained trade receivable back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision based on all evidence. The deletion of the disallowance of depreciation amounting to Rs. 28,76,386 was upheld, but subject to verification by the AO regarding the purchase dates of the assets. The Tribunal provided detailed analysis and directions for each issue raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>