<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the addition of Rs. 42,80,19,650 under section 68 was deleted due to lack of incriminating material and reliance on a retracted statement. The challenge to the validity of the assessment order was left open, favoring the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the addition by the Assessing Officer was deleted, with the Tribunal&#039;s order issued on 16.09.2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:18:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the addition of Rs. 42,80,19,650 under section 68 was deleted due to lack of incriminating material and reliance on a retracted statement. The challenge to the validity of the assessment order was left open, favoring the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the addition by the Assessing Officer was deleted, with the Tribunal&#039;s order issued on 16.09.2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>