https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413944 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of NCLT, Mumbai Bench under Section 241(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It held that the petitioner should pursue statutory remedies available under the Companies Act and not resort to writ jurisdiction. The court refrained from ruling on the validity of the impugned order and letter, suggesting that such matters should be addressed by the specialized forums of NCLT or NCLAT. en-us Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413944 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of NCLT, Mumbai Bench under Section 241(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It held that the petitioner should pursue statutory remedies available under the Companies Act and not resort to writ jurisdiction. The court refrained from ruling on the validity of the impugned order and letter, suggesting that such matters should be addressed by the specialized forums of NCLT or NCLAT. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413944