https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298280 The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to a significant delay in filing without an initial application for condonation of delay. The Appellant's claim of a two-day delay was opposed by the Respondent, emphasizing the lack of action taken between the judgment date and the application for a certified copy. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to prescribed timelines for filing appeals under the Companies Act, 2013, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the need for timely appeal submissions to avoid dismissal. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:16:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298280 The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to a significant delay in filing without an initial application for condonation of delay. The Appellant's claim of a two-day delay was opposed by the Respondent, emphasizing the lack of action taken between the judgment date and the application for a certified copy. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to prescribed timelines for filing appeals under the Companies Act, 2013, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the need for timely appeal submissions to avoid dismissal. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298280