https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298286 The governing seniority regime for Assistant Consolidation Officer cadre was identified as the U.P. Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, which prevail over other service rules on seniority. Seniority is ordinarily linked to the date of substantive appointment, and where both direct recruits and promotees are appointed, the rules require a cyclic rota in accordance with the prescribed quota and recruitment year. The 1992 service rules were treated as relevant to explain the recruitment-year structure and the need to place both sources within that year. A blanket en bloc preference for promotees over direct recruits was rejected; seniority must be fixed by applying the rota or cyclic order. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:16:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298286 The governing seniority regime for Assistant Consolidation Officer cadre was identified as the U.P. Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, which prevail over other service rules on seniority. Seniority is ordinarily linked to the date of substantive appointment, and where both direct recruits and promotees are appointed, the rules require a cyclic rota in accordance with the prescribed quota and recruitment year. The 1992 service rules were treated as relevant to explain the recruitment-year structure and the need to place both sources within that year. A blanket en bloc preference for promotees over direct recruits was rejected; seniority must be fixed by applying the rota or cyclic order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298286