<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 33 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26934</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, M. B. Engineering Works (P.) Ltd., in a case involving penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that penalty provisions were not applicable, emphasizing that rejecting the assessee&#039;s version did not automatically imply wilful neglect or fraud. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the burden of proof and affirmed that the penalty cannot be imposed solely based on disallowed deductions or additions in the assessment. The High Court&#039;s decision favored the assessee, dismissing the penalty order imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 33 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26934</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, M. B. Engineering Works (P.) Ltd., in a case involving penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that penalty provisions were not applicable, emphasizing that rejecting the assessee&#039;s version did not automatically imply wilful neglect or fraud. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the burden of proof and affirmed that the penalty cannot be imposed solely based on disallowed deductions or additions in the assessment. The High Court&#039;s decision favored the assessee, dismissing the penalty order imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>