https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298291 The expression "Chief Justice" in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 refers to the Chief Justice alone for roster, case allocation and constitution of Benches; it cannot be read as a collegium of the five senior-most judges. The collegium reasoning under Article 124 concerns judicial appointments and does not extend to day-to-day listing or roster formation. Listing and allocation of matters must conform to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and the Handbook on Practice and Procedure and Office Procedure, while the Chief Justice retains the settled administrative prerogative as Master of Roster within that framework. The petition challenging that structure was rejected. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:16:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298291 The expression "Chief Justice" in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 refers to the Chief Justice alone for roster, case allocation and constitution of Benches; it cannot be read as a collegium of the five senior-most judges. The collegium reasoning under Article 124 concerns judicial appointments and does not extend to day-to-day listing or roster formation. Listing and allocation of matters must conform to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and the Handbook on Practice and Procedure and Office Procedure, while the Chief Justice retains the settled administrative prerogative as Master of Roster within that framework. The petition challenging that structure was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298291