<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1278 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298294</link>
    <description>Custody in a prosecution under the Customs Act did not bar release on bail under Section 439 CrPC, and the Court found the appellant entitled to bail. Release was directed through the Trial Court within three days, subject to conditions securing his presence, restricting travel outside the jurisdiction without permission, requiring regular reporting to the police station, and cooperation with the investigation. The operative effect was grant of bail with supervision-based safeguards rather than continued detention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1278 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298294</link>
      <description>Custody in a prosecution under the Customs Act did not bar release on bail under Section 439 CrPC, and the Court found the appellant entitled to bail. Release was directed through the Trial Court within three days, subject to conditions securing his presence, restricting travel outside the jurisdiction without permission, requiring regular reporting to the police station, and cooperation with the investigation. The operative effect was grant of bail with supervision-based safeguards rather than continued detention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>