https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298276 In a TADA matter, prolonged pre-trial custody weighed in favour of bail because the accused had remained incarcerated since 16-7-1992, an early trial had not materialised, no regular TADA Court was functioning at Bombay, and further time was needed before trial could begin. The Court treated continued detention pending an uncertain commencement of trial as unjustified and granted bail, but only with strict safeguards, including weekly police reporting, a travel restriction without permission, surrender of travel documents, and execution of bond. en-us Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 May 2022 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298276 In a TADA matter, prolonged pre-trial custody weighed in favour of bail because the accused had remained incarcerated since 16-7-1992, an early trial had not materialised, no regular TADA Court was functioning at Bombay, and further time was needed before trial could begin. The Court treated continued detention pending an uncertain commencement of trial as unjustified and granted bail, but only with strict safeguards, including weekly police reporting, a travel restriction without permission, surrender of travel documents, and execution of bond. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298276