<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 952 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the disallowance of Rs. 17,92,413 under section 36(1)(va) was unjustified as the payments were made before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1). The amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by the Finance Act, 2021, were held to apply prospectively from 01.04.2021 and not retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 952 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the disallowance of Rs. 17,92,413 under section 36(1)(va) was unjustified as the payments were made before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1). The amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by the Finance Act, 2021, were held to apply prospectively from 01.04.2021 and not retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>