<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 951 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413899</link>
    <description>The revision order by the ld PCIT u/s 263 of the Act was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee, a co-operative housing society, was allowed. The court found that the ld AO had appropriately considered the deduction claim u/s 80P(2)(d) and had conducted necessary inquiries, leading to a nil income determination after allowing the deduction. The invocation of section 80P(4) was deemed incorrect. The order was pronounced on 12/10/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2021 07:53:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=659245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 951 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413899</link>
      <description>The revision order by the ld PCIT u/s 263 of the Act was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee, a co-operative housing society, was allowed. The court found that the ld AO had appropriately considered the deduction claim u/s 80P(2)(d) and had conducted necessary inquiries, leading to a nil income determination after allowing the deduction. The invocation of section 80P(4) was deemed incorrect. The order was pronounced on 12/10/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>